Primary Navigation

BLAWg In Bloom

The Indiana Law Library Blog

« Previous Entries

Next Entries »

Prof. Henderson on Legal Success

National Jurist this month features an article by our own Prof. Bill Henderson on changes in what firms should be looking for in new hires.  Traditionally those with the best LSAT scores, the highest ranked schools, and the best grades are favored.  Prof. Henderson argues that just those limited factors aren’t enough to be predictors of legal success, and particularly in this tight job market, firms need to be looking for much more when they hire.  What do you think makes for a good and successful lawyer?  Are hiring practices likely to change accordingly? 

More from Above the Law, the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, and the ABA Journal.

On Like Donkey Kong

Nintendo, with its new video game Donkey Kong Country Returns set to hit the shelves shortly, has just started a campaign to trademark the popular phrase “It’s on like Donkey Kong.”  Does the inclusion of the name of one of Nintendo’s most popular characters make this a trademark worthy phrase?  Nintendo certainly didn’t invent the saying—many attribute it originally to rapper Ice Cube—but that doesn’t mean they don’t have a stake in it.  What do you think?  CNN has the story.

Class Action v. Arbitration

Yesterday the Supreme Court heard a case that some argue could essentially do away with class action lawsuits as we know them.  General consensus this morning (for example from the Wall Street Journal Law Blog and the National Law Journal) seems to suggest that the Court is likely to find in favor of class actions, but it is an interesting problem.  The lawsuit in question is AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, a California case in which a couple challenged the portion of their AT&T contract which bound them to individual rather than class arbitration.  AT&T’s lawyer suggested that this case could also reach the other extreme—doing away with arbitration clauses in many standard contracts.  What do you think?  Should class arbitration be a standard subset of arbitration?  More can be found from the New York Times.

Election Day

Today is Election Day, and a it is particularly tight one this year.  Yahoo News mentions Indiana as an indicator state.  We posted information yesterday on current local elections, and on how to find your polling place.  For a more general look at Election Day in the United States, has a nice page of links for things like the history of the Electoral College, and past vote counts.  Happy voting!

Google Under Fire

Only a few days ago Google was apologizing for accidentally capturing a great deal of sensitive information, including e-mails, e-mail addresses, and passwords with its street view cars.  More on the Indiana Law Blog and  Today the Wall Street Journal Law Blog tells us that Google’s latest proposed purchase, a flight data software called ITA is being vehemently opposed by several smaller travel companies. They claim that Google with have far too much power over the travel industry.  Has Google gotten too big?  Is there a point where antitrust questions are nearly automatic when a company expands into a new market?

Lunar Law

Property law is a rather tangled web here on Earth, so imagine the difficulties associated with land and resource rights on the moon.  The Wall Street Journal Law Blog has a very interesting entry on moon rights today.  With the recent discovery of water on the moon, it becomes more likely that humanity will hasten its exploration of the moon.  So how will ownership of the moon be decided?  There were a few treaties made back when moon exploration was at its height, but it is still difficult to say who can claim ownership and how.  For more look at this older but still interesting article in Popular Mechanics.  To buy your own little chunk of the moon, try the Lunar Embassy.

Bauer v. Shepard

Bauer v. Shepard is an Indiana case currently on petition for certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court.  It is the SCOTUSblog petition of the day today.  The case is about the right of Indiana judges to speak about controversial issues.  A group called Indiana Right to Life, Inc. sends questionnaires out to judges every year asking for opinions on abortion.  Many judges decline to answer, some of them because they worry that expressing opinions on such a controversial issue would violate the Indiana Code of Judicial Conduct.  Now Indiana Right to Life and a few judges have joined in asking that certain provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct be declared unconstitutional. Several entries on the Indiana Law Blog have been keeping track of the case.

What do you think?  Should judges be allowed to express an opinion on controversial issues?  If they do, should they be allowed to rule on cases dealing with those issues?

An Animal Abuse Registry?

A few times in recent years animal rights activists have floated the idea of an animal abuse registry similar to sex offender registries. Such a measure recently passed in Suffolk County, New York.  The idea is to not only protect animals but also people, as there have been some links between animal abuse and other violent crime.  What do you think?  Should this be a standard measure?  For information, take a look at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, the New York Times, the Associated Press, and Time Magazine.

Supreme Court Tackles Vaccine Case

Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court heard Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, the case of a now 18-year-old girl who began to show signs of developmental impairment after receiving a vaccination when she was six months old.  There have been many studies on the effects of vaccines, some claiming that they are linked to autism.  In 1988 the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 came into effect and established special procedures for those that have been injured by vaccines.  Plaintiffs go to a special “vaccine court” and petition the Federal Government for damages rather than suing companies who make vaccines.  This system is meant to keep vaccines affordable and available while still giving redress to those who are injured.  It also means that if the vaccine is properly prepared, the company who made it will not be at fault. For more you can look at the piece the New York Times did just before the case, or the article which came just after.

What do you think?  It is unquestionably important that those injured by vaccines get reparations, but on the other side, it is also important that vaccines are economically viable to produce.

The Court on Television

Reality judicial television shows have been around for many years.  Many of us have grown up on The People’s Court and Judge Judy.  But how do these shows first get on the air?  And what crosses the line between maintaining the dignity of the judicial system and pure entertainment?  One judge in San Diego, Judge DeAnn Salcido, recently decided to film a few of the more entertaining cases that came to her courtroom, complete with her own off-the-cuff wit in hopes of being the next courtroom TV show.  Instead of a contract she is facing discipline from the Commission on Judicial Performance.  The notice contends, among other things, that she was not upholding the integrity of the judiciary, that she made some inappropriate remarks.  Judge Salcido recently filed a response. covers the story in two nice articles here and here.

What do you think?  Should Judge Salcido be sanctioned?  Should she get a TV show? For that matter, how do you feel about Judge Judy? Where do you think we should draw the line between the law and entertainment?

« Previous Entries

Next Entries »