Indiana University Bloomington

Primary Navigation

Law Library

Sample horizontal photo

Services

Faculty Publications

Mark Janis
Robert A. Lucas Chair of Law; Director, Center for Intellectual Property Research
  1. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OF PLANTS (with H.H. Jervis and R. Peet). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
  2. TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION: LAW AND POLICY, 4th Ed. (with Graeme B. Dinwoodie). New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2014.
  3. Virtual Designs (with Jason Du Mont), 2014 STANFORD TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW 107 (2014). [SSRN]
  4. The Origins of American Design Protection (with Jason Du Mont), 88 INDIANA LAW JOURNAL 837 (2013). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]
  5. TRADEMARK AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW IN A NUTSHELL. Eagan, MN: West Publishing, 2013.
  6. The False Allure of Patent Eligibility Restrictions in the U.S., 43 INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW: IIC 1 (2012).
  7. Functionality in Design Protection Systems (with Jason Du Mont), 19 JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 262 (2012). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]
  8. Interfaces in Plant Intellectual Property, in OVERLAPPING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (Neil Wilkof and Shamnad Basheer, Eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  9. Patent Law's Audience (with Timothy R. Holbrook), 97 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 72 (2012). [SSRN] [HeinOnline] [Journal Website]
  10. TRADEMARKS IN A NUTSHELL (with Graeme B. Dinwoodie) Eagan, MN: West Publishing, 2012.
  11. Tuning the Obviousness Inquiry After KSR, 7 WASHINGTON JOURNAL OF LAW, TECHNOLOGY & ARTS 335 (2012). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]
  12. TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION: LAW & POLICY, 3rd Ed. (with Graeme B. Dinwoodie). New York: Aspen Publishers, 2010. Supplements, 2011, 2012.

  13. Book Review. Liber Amicorum Joseph Straus, 42 INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW: ICC 752 (2011).
  14. TRADE DRESS AND DESIGN LAW (with Graeme B. Dinwoodie). New York: Aspen Publishers, 2010.
  15. IP AND ANTITRUST LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF ANTITRUST PRINCIPLES APPLIED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, 2nd Ed. (with H. Hovenkamp, et. al.). New York: Aspen Law & Business Publishers, 2009.

  16. International and Comparative Aspects of Trademark Dilution (with Peter K. Yu), 17 TRANSNATIONAL LAW & CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 603 (2008). [HeinOnline]
  17. Patent Pools, in ISSUES IN COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY VOL. ONE (Wayne Dale Collison, Ed.). Chicago: American Bar Association, 2008.

  18. TRADEMARK LAW AND THEORY: A HANDBOOK OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH (with Graeme B Dinwoodie, Eds.). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008.
  19. Confusion Over Use: Contextualism in Trademark Law (with Graeme B. Dinwoodie), 92 IOWA LAW REVIEW 1597 (2007) [SSRN] [HeinOnline]. Reprinted in 98 TRADEMARK REPORTER 1086 (2008).

  20. Lessons from the Trademark Use Debate (with Graeme B. Dinwoodie), 92 IOWA LAW REVIEW 1703 (2007). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

  21. Rules v. Standards for Patent Law in the Plant Sciences, 24 LAW IN CONTEXT 54 (2006). Reprinted in AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION: SEEDS OF CHANGE (Jay P. Kesan, Ed.). Oxford: CABI, 2007.

  22. Technological Change and the Design of Plant Variety Protection Regimes, (with Stephen Smith) 82 CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW 1557 (2007). To be reprinted, U.N. FAO Legal Office legal studies papers (2008). [HeinOnline]

  23. TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION: LAW & POLICY, 2nd Ed. (with Graeme B. Dinwoodie). New York: Aspen Publishers, 2007. Supplements, 2008, 2009.

  24. Unilateral Refusals to License (with Herbert Hovenkamp and Mark A. Lemley), 2 JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMY 1 (2006).
  25. “Minimal” Standards for Patent/Antitrust Under TRIPs, in INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC GOODS & TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY UNDER A GLOBALIZED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGIME (Keith Maskus and Jerome H. Reichman, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2005.
  26. Unilateral Refusals to License in the US (with Herbert Hovenkamp and Mark A. Lemley), in ANTITRUST, PATENTS AND COPYRIGHT (Francois Leveque & Howard Shelanski, Eds.). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005.

  27. Use, Constructive Use, and Registration in the United States (with Graeme B. Dinwoodie), in TRADE MARK USE (Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University, 2005.

  28. Balancing Ease and Accuracy in Assessing Pharmaceutical Exclusion Payments (with Herbert Hovenkamp and Mark A. Lemley), 88 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 712 (2004). [HeinOnline]

  29. Commentary, Equilibrium in a Technology-Specific Patent System, 54 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LAW REVIEW 743 (2004). [HeinOnline]

  30. Reforming Patent Validity Litigation: The “Dubious Preponderance”, 19 BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 923 (2004). [HeinOnline]

  31. Supplemental Forms of Intellectual Property Protection for Plants, 6 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE, & TECHNOLOGY 305 (2004). Reprinted in 7 BIO-SCIENCE LAW REVIEW 32 (2005). [HeinOnline]

  32. TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION: LAW & POLICY (with Graeme B. Dinwoodie). New York: Aspen Publishers, 2004. Supplements, 2005, 2006.

  33. Anticompetitive Settlement of Intellectual Property Disputes (with Herbert Hovenkamp and Mark A. Lemley), 87 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW 1719 (2003). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

  34. Intellectual Property Issues in Plant Breeding and Plant Biotechnology, in BIOTECHNOLOGY, GENE FLOW, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: AN AGRICULTURAL SUMMIT 5. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University (2002).

  35. Intellectual Property Protection for Plant Innovation: Unresolved Issues After J.E.M. v. Pioneer (with Jay P. Kesan), 20 NATURE/BIOTECHNOLOGY 1161 (2002).

  36. IP AND ANTITRUST LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF ANTITRUST PRINCIPLES APPLIED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW (with H. Hovenkamp and M.A. Lemley). New York: Aspen Law & Business Publishers, 2002.

  37. Patent Abolitionism, 17 BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 899 (2002). [HeinOnline]. Reprinted in PATENTS (CRITICAL CONCEPTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW SERIES), (J. S. Miller, Ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2010.

  38. Themes in Federal Circuit Patent Jurisprudence, 2000-2001, in 7 INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & POLICY (Hugh C. Hansen, Ed.) New York: Juris Publishing, 2002. [PDF]

  39. Transitions in IP and Antitrust, 47 ANTITRUST BULLETIN 253 (2002).

  40. U.S. Plant Variety Protection: Sound and Fury. . .? (with Jay P. Kesan), 39 UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW REVIEW 727 (2002). [SSRN] Reprinted in INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: CRITICAL CONCEPTS IN LAW, v. 3 (David Vaver, Ed.). London: Routledge, 2006.

  41. Designing an Optimal Intellectual Property System for Plants: A Supreme Court Debate (with Jay P. Kesan), 19 NATURE/BIOTECHNOLOGY 981 (October 2001).

  42. Patent Law in the Age of the Invisible Supreme Court, 2001 ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW 387 (2001). [SSRN] [HeinOnline]

  43. Sustainable Agriculture, Patent Rights, and Plant Innovation, 9 INDIANA JOURNAL OF GLOBAL LEGAL STUDIES 91 (2001). [HeinOnline]
  44. Inter Partes Patent Reexamination, 10 FORDHAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, MEDIA, AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 481 (2000). [HeinOnline]
  45. On Courts Herding Cats: Contending with the Written Description Requirement, 2 WASHINGON UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF LAW & POLICY 55 (2000). [HeinOnline]

  46. Second Tier Patent Protection, 40 HARVARD INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 151 (1999). Reprinted in 33 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW 17 (2001). [HeinOnline]

  47. A Tale of the Apocryphal Axe: Repair, Reconstruction, and the Implied License in Intellectual Property Law, 58 MARYLAND LAW REVIEW 423 (1999). [HeinOnline]

  48. Who’s Afraid of Functional Claims: Reforming the Federal Circuit’s §112, ¶6 Jurisprudence, 15 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW 231 (1999). [HeinOnline]

  49. Rethinking Reexamination: Towards a Viable Administrative Revocation System for U.S. Patent Law, 11 HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY 1 (1997). Excerpted in FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (Robert P. Merges & Jane Ginsburg). New York: Foundation Press, 2004. [HeinOnline]

  50. Unmasking Structural Equivalency: The Intersection of §112, ¶6 Equivalents and the Doctrine of Equivalents, 4 ALBANY LAW JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 205 (1994). [HeinOnline]

  51. Judge & Jury Roles in Equivalents Analysis: Commentary on Malta v. Schulmerich Carillons, 74 JOURNAL OF PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE SOCIETY 621 (1992).